With Broadcom’s acquisition of VMware, many organizations are re-evaluating their virtualization and cloud strategies. VMware ESXi has long been a dominant player in enterprise virtualization, but recent changes in licensing models and support under Broadcom have prompted enterprises to explore alternative solutions like Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization, which offers a Kubernetes-native virtualization platform.
This article compares OpenShift Virtualization and VMware ESXi across key criteria such as maturity, cost, ease of operation, stability and support, automation, and adherence to regulatory standards like PCI DSS.
1. Maturity
VMware ESXi:
VMware ESXi is one of the most mature hypervisors in the market, with a proven track record spanning over two decades. It has evolved to provide robust virtualization solutions, serving large enterprises and cloud providers. VMware’s vSphere suite is widely trusted for mission-critical workloads, and the ecosystem is well-supported by a large community and a comprehensive range of integrations with third-party tools.
OpenShift Virtualization:
OpenShift Virtualization, built on KubeVirt, is relatively newer in comparison to VMware. However, it benefits from Red Hat’s strong track record in open-source and enterprise platforms, particularly with OpenShift’s maturity in container orchestration. While OpenShift Virtualization may not have the decades of refinement that VMware offers, it integrates well with modern cloud-native infrastructure, making it a strong candidate for organizations moving towards containerization and Kubernetes-based workflows.
Verdict: VMware ESXi is more mature in traditional virtualization environments, while OpenShift Virtualization is quickly maturing in Kubernetes-native infrastructures.
2. Cost
VMware ESXi (Post-Broadcom Acquisition):
Following Broadcom’s acquisition, there is concern over the rising costs associated with VMware’s licensing. Historically, VMware has been seen as a premium offering, and Broadcom is expected to increase subscription-based licensing costs further. For companies looking to scale or move towards a hybrid-cloud model, these rising costs could impact their total cost of ownership (TCO).
OpenShift Virtualization:
OpenShift Virtualization is bundled as part of Red Hat OpenShift, making it attractive for organizations already using OpenShift for containerized workloads. The cost of OpenShift Virtualization is generally lower when considering Kubernetes-native environments, particularly for companies moving towards DevOps and container-first architectures. However, licensing and support costs can add up, especially if deploying at scale with enterprise features.
Verdict: OpenShift Virtualization can be more cost-effective for Kubernetes-native organizations, while VMware ESXi’s costs have become more prohibitive with Broadcom’s licensing changes.
3. Ease of Operation
VMware ESXi:
VMware is known for its user-friendly management interface with vCenter, which simplifies the management of virtualized environments. It has well-established tools for managing virtual machines (VMs), storage, and networking. VMware’s UI and automation features such as vRealize Automation make it easy to manage, especially for traditional IT administrators who are familiar with virtual machine-focused infrastructure.
OpenShift Virtualization:
OpenShift Virtualization operates within the Kubernetes ecosystem, which can be complex for teams unfamiliar with containerized or cloud-native architectures. Managing VMs in OpenShift requires knowledge of Kubernetes primitives, which has a steep learning curve for administrators used to managing traditional VMs. However, once the OpenShift platform is adopted, the management of both containers and VMs in a unified platform provides a more integrated experience for DevOps-driven organizations.
Verdict: VMware ESXi is easier to manage for traditional virtualization environments, while OpenShift Virtualization is better suited for organizations with Kubernetes and cloud-native expertise.
4. Stability and Support
VMware ESXi:
VMware is known for its stability, with mature support options and a vast ecosystem of certified partners. The acquisition by Broadcom, however, has raised concerns about potential changes in the quality and availability of support. While VMware has historically provided excellent support, the acquisition may lead to service shifts focused on large enterprises, potentially leaving smaller organizations without the same level of attention.
OpenShift Virtualization:
OpenShift Virtualization benefits from Red Hat’s Enterprise Support, which is well-regarded, especially for open-source environments. Red Hat’s focus on long-term stability, security, and performance in enterprise deployments makes OpenShift a reliable choice for businesses. Red Hat has also been increasing its support capabilities around Kubernetes-based virtualization.
Verdict: Both platforms offer strong support, but VMware may experience changes under Broadcom, while Red Hat’s OpenShift Virtualization provides steady support for organizations already aligned with Kubernetes.
5. Automation
VMware ESXi:
VMware excels at automation, particularly with tools like vRealize Automation, PowerCLI, and VMware vSphere APIs. VMware’s automation capabilities are extensive, allowing for seamless integration with third-party orchestration tools and automating complex workflows in enterprise data centers.
OpenShift Virtualization:
OpenShift Virtualization is designed for automation within a cloud-native environment. It integrates well with GitOps, CI/CD pipelines, and automation frameworks such as Ansible and Kubernetes-native automation tools. However, for traditional VM-based workloads, it may require more effort to automate processes compared to VMware, which has more mature VM automation tools.
Verdict: VMware is better suited for automating traditional virtualization workflows, while OpenShift Virtualization excels in automating cloud-native and container-centric environments.
6. Adherence to Regulations (e.g., PCI DSS, GDPR)
VMware ESXi:
VMware has built-in compliance tools and third-party integrations that help organizations adhere to regulatory standards such as PCI DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR. VMware NSX provides micro-segmentation and encryption options, while tools like VMware Compliance Checker ensure configurations align with industry regulations.
OpenShift Virtualization:
OpenShift Virtualization can meet regulatory standards like PCI DSS and GDPR, but achieving compliance often requires more manual setup. Red Hat OpenShift provides features like SELinux, Kubernetes Security Contexts, and Pod Security Policies to enforce security and compliance. However, meeting traditional compliance requirements with VMs in a Kubernetes-native environment may require additional customization and configuration.
Verdict: VMware provides a more out-of-the-box compliance solution for traditional regulations, while OpenShift Virtualization can meet compliance standards but may require more customization, especially for hybrid container-VM environments.
Conclusion
The comparison between VMware ESXi and Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization is nuanced, particularly in light of Broadcom’s acquisition of VMware. While VMware ESXi remains a solid and mature platform for traditional virtualization workloads, its cost and potential support changes make it less attractive for some organizations post-acquisition.
OpenShift Virtualization, on the other hand, is quickly maturing, especially for organizations already embracing Kubernetes and cloud-native infrastructure. It excels in cost-effectiveness, automation, and DevOps integration, but it requires a higher level of expertise to manage effectively, especially for organizations transitioning from traditional virtualization platforms.
For enterprises focused on traditional VM workloads, VMware remains a strong choice, but for those adopting cloud-native architectures or seeking flexibility with containers and VMs in one platform, OpenShift Virtualization presents a compelling alternative.